What is a public forum under the First Amendment?

A public forum is a place where individuals exercise their right to freedom of speech and assembly, with protections varying based on whether the forum is traditional, designated, limited, or nonpublic. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution ensures certain protections for these fundamental rights.

How does viewpoint discrimination apply in public forums?

Viewpoint discrimination—targeting speakers based on their specific views—is prohibited in traditional and designated public forums. The government must meet strict scrutiny standards when restricting speech content and cannot exclude speakers based on viewpoint even in limited forums.

Are social media accounts by public officials considered public forums?

Yes, federal courts including the United States District Court for the Southern District of California have found that when public officials use social media accounts for official communications, these platforms function as public forums subject to First Amendment scrutiny.

What is the legal definition of proscribable speech under the First Amendment?

Proscribable speech refers to narrow categories of expression that fall outside First Amendment protection, including incitement to imminent lawless action, true threats, obscenity, defamation, fighting words, and child pornography. These categories must meet strict legal tests established by Supreme Court jurisprudence.

What is the current test for incitement to unlawful activity?

The modern standard for incitement was established in Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), requiring that protected speech may only be proscribed if it is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. This test remains the governing constitutional standard.

#separator_saFirst Amendment Victory

Darren Chaker AntiSLAPP Motion

AntiSLAPP motion filed by attorneys for Darren Chaker in the San Diego Superior Court.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Darren Chaker AntiSLAPP First Amendment Law from Darren Chaker

About The Author

Darren Chaker

In Chaker v. Crogan, 428 F.3d 1215 C.A.9 (Cal.),2005, Cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1128, 126 S.Ct. 2023, is a case Darren Chaker personally handled and laid the ground work to allow appellate counsel to strike down a statute based on First Amendment rights.

Darren also enjoys traveling, being a phenomenal father, and forwarding his education with post graduate degree work.

See author's posts

Darren Chaker

In 2017, Darren Chaker won again where a failed attorney, Scott McMillan, San Diego, sued in federal court alleging defamation in the context of a RICO case. The federal court dismissed the lawsuit and found the case to be meritless. Attorney McMillan filed a notice of appeal with the Ninth Circuit federal appeals court. In Chaker v. Crogan, 428 F.3d 1215 C.A.9 (Cal.),2005, Cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1128, 126 S.Ct. 2023, is a case Darren Chaker personally handled and laid the ground work to allow appellate counsel to strike down a statute based on First Amendment rights. Darren also enjoys traveling, being a phenomenal father, and forwarding his education with post graduate degree work.

See Full Bio

Darren Chaker AntiSLAPP Motion

About The Author

Darren Chaker

More Stories

California Supreme Court Reviews Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles, S275272 and Implications of Chaker v. Crogan

San Diego Attorney Scott McMillan Fights Blogger

Darren Chaker Blogger Put in Jail Reverses Conviction

How Amicus Briefs Shape First Amendment Law in Courts

Supervised Release and First Amendment Speech Rights

Penal Code 148.6 and the Growing Threat to Free Speech

5 Landmark Legal Cases You Must Know About False Statements

Chaker v. Crogan

Michaelides v. Chaker

Recent Posts

Recent Posts

About The Author

More Stories

You may have missed