Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Chaker v. Croganhas been cited hundreds of times and continues to be written about extensively. Some great publications about viewpoint discrimination are:
* Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 10:22.50, Brandenburg v. Ohio: Intent and imminence standard–Bond and Watts decisions–“True threats” (2010)
* CHAKER V. CROGAN, 5 Cardozo Pub.L. Pol’y & Ethics J. 425, 444+ (2007)
* Police Misconduct: Law and Litigation s 2:28, Denial of First Amendment rights (2009)
* Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 3:11, Viewpoint discrimination–Cross-burning reprised: Commonwealth of Virginia v. Black–Heavy presumption against viewpoint discrimination (2010)
In Cuadra v. City ofSouth San Francisco, 2010 WL 55875, *1+ (N.D.Cal. Jan 04, 2010), plaintiff was arrested under the law Darren Chaker invalidated. Cuadra subsequently sued and the case settled after the federal court refused to dismiss the case.